Sit back, relax and enjoy the tutorials! If you are looking for even more videos, head over to my YouTube channel.

recordingrevolution
channel
10
published

More Videos

buttons

5,311 views

Uploaded by recordingrevolution on
May 5, 2013

Mixing Console Templates In Your DAW – TheRecordingRevolution.com

Speed up your mixing workflow by setting up a console style template for your tracks. – Download my free eBook “The #1 Rule Of Home Recording” for more tips …

Comments

  • @Pughtube08 Thanks for clearing that up. I didn’t realize the fx bin was post-fader in pro tools. It’s pre-fader in Sonar, which is what I use. I do see Graham has his final fx on a mix buss, not the master channel, but didn’t catch it until I looked. Really important point there, thanks again.
    Posted by Malisque on May 19, 2013
  • I’m sorry you had to see that.
    Posted by jkunblade on May 18, 2013
  • wtf
    Posted by IASoundShiftMM on May 18, 2013
  • @Malisque, you are correct except for when using your final stereo out you want to apply any maximizing, limiting or last touches post fader. Google the SoundOnSound article entitled “Headroom & Master Fader” – there are a few other articles and tutorials on the concept. Take care.
    Posted by pughtube08 on May 18, 2013
  • Good topic!
    I´ve been thinking about making templates on Cubase, but my projects seem to be so different, no one will ever do. To get to the point, where you actually have preferences like that, takes a lot of trial and error. But it also leads to routine, both in good and in bad.
    Routines speed up the workflow but then again easily snuffs out creativity and outside the box thinkng.
    Posted by meomarte on May 18, 2013
  • Hey, wait a minute… plugins are pre-fader on the master anyway, aren’t they?
    Posted by Malisque on May 18, 2013
  • A template like this cant take more than fifteen minutes to set up. (:
    Posted by CIVILLIANmusic on May 18, 2013
  • Alt CMD D to hide the dock ;)
    Posted by Harrysound on May 17, 2013
  • the purge seriously has to be one of the worst movies ever lol
    Posted by TheFallingSky1 on May 17, 2013
  • I do exactly the same, thought I do it for my orchestra.
    Posted by Mikolaj Holowko on May 17, 2013
  • Very helpful, Graham, especially for those of us who have day jobs and not enough time to set up an entire console from scratch for each new project. I sure wish I could download that template from you!
    Posted by Will Robinson on May 17, 2013
  • Because then the trim would be coming after EQ and compression you FOOL!
    Posted by jkunblade on May 16, 2013
  • Why not just put one trim plugin one the premix bus?
    Posted by jkunblade on May 16, 2013
  • Well. Cubase has kinda built in trim plugins for each track then. There’s volume and phase knob before plugins.
    Posted by IASoundShiftMM on May 16, 2013
  • Graham;
    What is the submix channel used for in your mixes? I understand your use of the mix buss, but was wondering the reason why you add a submix fader and what benefits it has :)
    Posted by 2201conman on May 16, 2013
  • no, it just takes some of the cpu usage of your DAW and opens another process, so your daw process won´t be overloaded.
    Posted by Alex Biegel on May 16, 2013
  • I have to try this, specially the import session data stuff…. Thanks!
    Posted by descargamusicalny on May 16, 2013
  • If you ever buy Sonar X2, get the SWA Complete Sonar X2 tutorials for $40.00; 9 hours of video tutorials on every aspect of the DAW. Best training tutes I’ve ever seen, and I’ve bought a lot of ‘em.
    Posted by TheFamousPatrick on May 16, 2013
  • I dunno; I started with computer recording with Cakewalk’s Guitar Tracks 2 for about $50.00 in 2003, and have slowly upgraded to the top of the line over the last 10 years. It all seems normal to me, and everything else looks unwieldy. Goes to show that there is a comfort level with what you are used to. If I ever change, it will be to Reaper. I bought a copy when it first came out, and just recently had to re-buy because it went up a couple of versions. Still the best value out there.
    Posted by TheFamousPatrick on May 16, 2013
  • Hey thanks you Famous Patrick Dude. As I look at ALL the DAWS out there, Sonar DOES have a bit greater learning curve but I’m so glad I’m past that for the most part. SO Sonar doesn’t look so deep. Pro Tools seems to really give one a break on the learning curve of high end editing and applications. I just never was crazy about having to buy hardware whereas Cake lets you get the most you can out of what you can afford. WITHOUT having to buy their breakouts and other hardware.
    Posted by 101AOK on May 16, 2013